Various Governance
- 1
- 17. Jan. 2016
- 2 Min. Lesezeit
Is it good for us to rule by laws without any potential objections? Would that positive for the citizen to follow rules of law without unexpected circumstances? Do the government manage the overall conditions without serious mistakes? The answers above go without saying － ‘Not really,’ so far as the majority are concerned. A number of people would think those questions in other ways of resolutions while they might agree on several regulations partially. Revolutions are good ways of competing with concrete clauses in most governments for some perspectives.
Copyright versus Piracy
Numerous books have their own copyright; so do pieces of articles, journal papers, photography, films, music or dance to the certain extent. You own your copyright if you write a poem. It seems that this is critical enough to protect the basic right for items. On the other hand, inventors for any confidential contributions are eager to prevent each of their own masterpieces.
Speaking of piracy, it is absolutely an illegal way of duplicating the entire tangible products as well as intangible services through inappropriate productions. People in Taiwan had been inspected once by US government generally in terms of piracy towards music, films, books and so forth. Us government could not stand the terrible situation on copied items. That was just a means to an end punished by the government.
Identification Number
A great number of conditions that people have no other alternative but to fill out each one of our identification numbers into tens of thousands of application forms. Why do we fight against the bad regulations on inserting ID number? Citizens should now and then refuse to write their personal information due to privacy. More and more people are concerned about the disclosure of information. How people need to prevent potential risks is one of the most significant missions to deal with. The problem-solving of ID number must set structured, systematic and organisational rules in order for construction of perceptions.
There is no home without a nation and vice versa. Most public servants may believe it with their loyalty. You can think to yourself – What would I anticipate?
Further Reading
Turner Entertainment Co. v Degeto Film GmbH
JONES, District Judge. (2004). Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School Dist. The United States of America
Sources
Schmidt, Eric & Cohen, Jared. (2013). The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business, Chapter 2, The Future of Identity, Citizenship and Reporting, pp 42-91.
Schmidt, Eric & Cohen, Jared. (2013). The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business, Chapter 3, The Future of States, pp 102-142.
演化 → 著作權法
Comentários